(866) 396-GOAL  
Welcome at » Response To Letter To Senate On AB 616: Annual Smog Tests

Response To Letter To Senate On AB 616: Annual Smog Tests

I wrote a letter to the California Senate regarding a mandate for annual smog testing for vintage vehicles. You can read the details here.

I thought I would collect responses to the letter here for a public record and a little learning into remote advocacy.

I would love to hear your thoughts on the subject below.

Do you own a car made from 1976-1982?

This affects you.

– jc

– Update: Aug 20 - The hearing to consider legislation on this matter has been postponed for now.

– Update: Sept 5 - Victory for now.

***
California Bill to Require ANNUAL Emissions Tests for Vehicles 15-Years Dead for the Year

In a major victory for enthusiasts in California, the Senate Appropriations Committee rejected SAN-opposed legislation (A.B. 616) that threatened to require annual Smog check inspections for vehicles 15-years old and older. After having been approved previously by the full California Assembly and the Senate Transportation Committee, the bill is dead for the year.

“Car clubs and individual hobbyists across the state loudly and forcefully objected to passage of this bill,” said SEMA Vice President of Government Affairs Steve McDonald. “Ultimately, the lawmakers in Sacramento heard their message.”

Through thousands of phone calls and emails, SAN members were able to convince committee members that these vehicles constitute a small portion of the overall vehicle population and are a poor source from which to look for emissions reduction.

In correspondence to his constituents, Senator Dave Cox expressed his opposition to the bill, “I have not yet seen any evidence that 15 year old vehicles pollute our air substantially more than 14 year old vehicles. Declaring all vehicles 15 years or older are guilty of being gross polluters without any empirical data is backwards and does not reflect the spirit of the law.”

Of additional concern to the enthusiast community were provisions in the bill that would have required that funds generated through the additional inspection fees be deposited into an account which could be used to scrap older cars.

“We are especially indebted to those legislators who opposed the bill because it would have placed an undue burden upon car owners simply because their vehicle is older than an arbitrary date set in law,” McDonald added.

The SAN would like to thank the countless individuals and car clubs whose dedication and persistence in contacting lawmakers in Sacramento as this bill moved through the legislative process. Special thanks to the Association of California Car Clubs for the coordinated effort by their member clubs in opposing this bill.***

6 Responses

  1. Senator Wyland




    Thank you for contacting my office. Due to the large volume of emails I receive, it is difficult to respond in a timely manner through this email address. To ensure a timely response to your message, please click here and send your comment to the “feed back” portion of my website. Thank you again for contacting my office, I appreciate your comments and opinion.

    Sincerely,

    Mark Wyland
    Senator, 38th District

  2. Senator Yee




    Due to an extremely large amount of spam, my staff and I are unable to respond to email sent to this account. Please use the “Contact Senator Yee” web form available on my website: www.sen.ca.gov/yee. We read and process all comments that come through this website and we do our best to respond promptly to inquiries.

    For urgent matters you may also phone my office at (916) 651-4008 or send a fax to (916) 327-2186.

    We regret any inconvenience. Your comments are very important to me and we look forward to hearing from you.

    Sincerely,

    Senator Leland Y. Yee, Ph.D.
    California State Senate

  3. Senator Kuehl




    Thank you for your message. As a State Senator I receive numerous emails every day and although I would prefer to answer each one, this is not always feasible. Every effort will be made to consider the issues raised in your email and to respond when possible. I truly thank you for taking the time to share your views with me.

    If you sent an invitation to attend or speak at an event, please contact my scheduler Monica Smiley directly at Monica.Smiley@sen.ca.gov or 916-651-4023.

    Thank you,
    Sheila J. Kuehl
    California State Senator

  4. Senator Corbett




    Thank you very much for taking the time to send me your e-mail. While I often receive hundreds of e-mails a week, I make every effort to respond to each of my constituents in a timely manner.

    Sincerely,

    ELLEN M. CORBETT
    Senator, 10th Senate District
    (510) 413-5960 (district office)

  5. Senator Oropeza




    Thank you for your e-mail. Due to the very large volume of e-mails I receive each day, I ask that you visit my website at www.sen.ca.gov/oropeza to submit your comments. Your views on bills and issues facing the Legislature are very important to me.

    Sincerely,
    JENNY OROPEZA
    State Senator, 28th District




  6. Thank you for contacting my office regarding Assembly Bill 616 (Jones). I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.

    Assembly Bill 616 would require vehicles 15 years or older, with the exception of pre-1976 model cars, to undergo annual smog inspections. Current law requires eligible vehicles to undergo biennial smog inspections.

    This piece of legislation would place an undue burden upon car owners simply because their vehicle is older than an arbitrary date set in law. This bill would double the cost for those vehicle owners as they would be required to submit to annual, instead of biennial, smog inspections. Additionally, the arbitrary nature of the 15 year threshold concerns me.

    I have not yet seen any evidence that 15 year old vehicles pollute our air substantially more than 14 year old vehicles. Declaring all vehicles 15 years or older are guilty of being gross polluters without any empirical data is backwards and does not reflect the spirit of the law. For these reasons, I oppose AB 616 in its current form.

    AB 616 passed from the Assembly on June 5, 2007 by a vote of 46 to 33. The bill is currently in the Senate Appropriations Committee.

    Again, thank you for contacting me. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call my office.

    Sincerely,

    DAVE COX
    Senator, First District

Leave a Reply

©1999-2009 Enthusiast Inc.  All rights reserved.
Contact Us     FAQ     Support     Privacy Policy     Site Map